I published this post on Medium as an experiment. You can find it here.
Occasional thoughts on my professional interests of digital media, technology, and the reindustrialization of the world; interspersed with even more occasional notes on my hobbies of linguistics, urban planning, New York, and cycling.
Thursday, February 4, 2016
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Startups and Small Businesses: Stop Focusing on Bandwidth
Most people focus on bandwidth when they think about internet connections, but speed is only one metric for measuring internet performance. Often it's not even the right one. For example, for real-time applications such as voice and video calling, what matters most is reliability. VoIP conversations (including Skype, WhatsApp, and Google Hangout voice calls) take up minimal bandwidth - much less than 1Mb - but bandwidth has to be consistent. Even a momentary dip in bandwidth - or a couple of seconds of downtime - can make conversation impossible.
With residential internet technologies, such as cable, DSL, or Fios - even though the physical medium for Fios is fiber, its architecture is effectively still residential-grade - your actual bandwidth is constantly fluctuating and rarely if ever reaches 100% of your advertised bandwidth. It may even drop to zero at points. That's because you are also sharing that bandwidth with your neighbors in your building, and possibly your block.
I've tried to illustrate this with the image below:
Wednesday, October 7, 2015
Who Owns Technology Spend?
I was listening to an a16z podcast on the way home about legacy businesses navigating the digital world, and I was struck by the following statistic: according to 2015 PwC's Digital IQ survey, 68% of enterprise tech spending this year is happening outside of the the IT organization. Even more striking, this number was only 32% in 2013. That's a 45% CAGR; the percentages controlled by the IT org and the rest of the business have flipped in only two years.
Since total tech spending can't be shrinking, there are two explanations. Either the IT organization's budget is being shifted to other parts of the business; or the growth in the tech spend outside of IT must be growing even faster than 45% yoy. That's an insane growth rate and if it is correct, an insane opportunity.
Since total tech spending can't be shrinking, there are two explanations. Either the IT organization's budget is being shifted to other parts of the business; or the growth in the tech spend outside of IT must be growing even faster than 45% yoy. That's an insane growth rate and if it is correct, an insane opportunity.
Labels:
Andreesen Horowitz,
budgets,
IT,
podcast,
PwC,
technology
Sunday, September 27, 2015
One Simple Customer Service Fix
Have you ever noticed that e-commerce receipts and online reservations tend to come from an email address in the form of "noreply@domain.com", followed by a message at the bottom of the email reminding you not to reply to that email? There's such an easy fix to this that it's embarrassing the customer service industry hasn't caught on.
Here's one that I got from Enterprise Car Share, a ZipCar competitor (red highlights mine; personal information removed):
Here's one that I got from Enterprise Car Share, a ZipCar competitor (red highlights mine; personal information removed):
Labels:
customer service,
Enterprise CarShare,
product
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Don't Guess, Learn
I'm currently building a product for WiredScore. We're not talking about the product publicly, so that's all I'm going to say about it.
To continue learning to be a better product manager, even while I'm practicing, I've been immersing myself in the best talks and videos on product management I can find. This morning while getting ready I watched this great video by Tom Chi on Rapid Prototyping at Google X. And Tom did really rapid prototyping; the first prototype of Google X took him about an hour, and they produced 15 hardware prototypes a week.
If there's one line to take away from Tom's talk it's, "Don't guess, learn." (link goes to a two-minute clip of just that section). Most meetings are "big guessathons." "I think the customer will want this." "I think they'll want that." "Stop guessing, go build the thing, and learn," Tom says. It's good advice. Most of us won't have access to the tools, brainpower, and endless test subjects that Tom had at Google, but I'm going to do my best to stay in this ethos.
To continue learning to be a better product manager, even while I'm practicing, I've been immersing myself in the best talks and videos on product management I can find. This morning while getting ready I watched this great video by Tom Chi on Rapid Prototyping at Google X. And Tom did really rapid prototyping; the first prototype of Google X took him about an hour, and they produced 15 hardware prototypes a week.
If there's one line to take away from Tom's talk it's, "Don't guess, learn." (link goes to a two-minute clip of just that section). Most meetings are "big guessathons." "I think the customer will want this." "I think they'll want that." "Stop guessing, go build the thing, and learn," Tom says. It's good advice. Most of us won't have access to the tools, brainpower, and endless test subjects that Tom had at Google, but I'm going to do my best to stay in this ethos.
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Buzzfeed Explained
I think it's safe to say that Buzzfeed remains an enigma to most people, even in the digital media industry. They do things so differently than everyone else [1] and in such a non-obvious way [2], and yet how is it that they are worth so much [3]?
There's been a lot of talk about their internal tools and platforms, but since no one outside the company uses them, they remain shrouded in speculation. How else can you explain Episode 40 of The Exponent podcast by Ben Thompson and James Allworth, two of the most respected tech and digital media analysts out there. At around 16:55 of the episode, James asks Ben, "Have you seen any of their tools? ... There's all this talk about the tools and the learning organization. I understand it conceptually, but if you're a writer sitting down to write one day at Buzzfeed ... what is it that the system gives you that gives you an edge over the competition?" Ben then hypothesizes that it's about making it easier to create a listicle, and then makes some other highly abstract conjectures about the tools, what works, what channels to use, ending with, "quite frankly I don't see how that's any different than a newspaper sharing its actual page with an advertiser. They're just sharing the tool, and the canvas. They're not sharing the actual writers ... " [4]
But Chris Dixon and Jonah Peretti sat down last August for a podcast, and did a pretty good job of explaining exactly how and why Buzzfeed works, in concrete enough terms that I feel like I finally get it. There's no need to explain how listicles and adorable cat pictures work, but I'll do my best to try and unpack the three parts of Buzzfeed that are perhaps less obvious based on what I've heard other say about them:
Saturday, April 11, 2015
The Rise of the New Edtech
Edtech used to be this sleepy, backwards corner of the
technology industry where idealistic entrepreneurs with fantastic ideas and
even fantastic products would try to make enterprise sales to impossible educational
bureaucracies – I saw this firsthand when I sat on the Wharton Technology Advisory
Board, and we were relatively one of the best technology organizations out there - only to burn out or sell for disappointing outcomes in the best cases.
In recent years though a couple of factors have pushed ed-tech forward to the point where LinkedIn would pay $1.5Bn to acquire Lynda.com:
Saturday, March 21, 2015
Brokerage vs Fulfillment
A few weeks ago a marketing consultant named Tom Goodwin wrote the following opening line in a post called The Battle Is For The Customer Interface:
[In 2015] Uber, the world’s largest taxi company, owns no vehicles. Facebook, the world’s most popular media owner, creates no content. Alibaba, the most valuable retailer, has no inventory. And Airbnb, the world’s largest accommodation provider, owns no real estate.The thing is, this isn't quite true.
Labels:
Airbnb,
Alibaba,
Business,
Chris Dixon,
disruption,
Facebook,
lodging,
taxis,
Uber,
Venture Capital
Thursday, March 12, 2015
The Power of Physical Words
![]() |
| The Holstee Manifesto |
The mix of people included total newcomers such as myself, as well as two of the founders and a number of members of the Holstee "family," who had been there since the beginning (or almost beginning). I was sitting next to co-founder Dave Radparvar, who was talking with a couple of these Holstee family members about the Manifesto and its runaway success. They sell so many posters of this simple statement of purpose that it's become the economic engine that enables the rest of their activity. Apparently people even get it tattooed on their body. They have a whole page of Holstee Manifesto products, ranging from $12 for a 5" x 7" print, to $180 for a 48" x 64" wall decal; it's almost as if they've become a company that sells the Manifesto as its primary line of business.
On the face of it, this seems highly unlikely. Don't we lament the death of print, even while we argue that content should be free? Why would people pay for content that any five-year old who has used the Internet could find for free. Holstee themselves have a downloads page where you can get a high-res copy that you could print and hang yourself. So what's going on here?
Friday, February 20, 2015
IoT Is Not Mobile on the Wall
I’ve started listening to a16z podcasts during some meals. I recommend them if you're interested in the future of technology. About a month ago I listened to this fascinating conversation between Benedict Evans, Preethi Kasireddy, and
Zal Bilmoria, though I'm just getting around to writing about it now (better late than never). Post-CES, they try to tackle the question of, where
is this Internet of Things we keep hearing about? Is there an Internet of
Things, or is it just “things connected to the Internet”?
Around 1:49 Benedict Evans makes the most compelling argument:
our grandparents could have told us how many electric motors they owned: one in
the car, one in the fridge, and one in the vacuum cleaner; and now motors are
so common that the side mirror of your car probably has a dozen. But no one
goes out and buys electric motors; they buy a microwave, a blender, a coffee
machine, etc. – devices that solve a problem that just happen have an
electric motor as part of the solution. So it is with the IoT: other than early adopters. it will enter
our lives slowly, as we buy device that solve our problems by adding a bit more
intelligence to existing devices, a bit at a time.
The analogy makes sense, but it has one fatal flaw: the functionality of electric motors is self-contained (with the exception of transportation, but we are discussing household devices here), whereas connected devices are not self-contained by definition.
Labels:
Andreesen Horowitz,
Connected Devices,
Internet of Things,
IoT,
mobile,
Nest,
Quirky,
Smart Home,
Wink
Friday, January 9, 2015
Your Email Newsletter Is Not Spam, It's Just Information Overload
If you're like me you might have noticed that it's become really common for people to say something like "We hate spam too" when asking you to sign up for their mailing list. The problem isn't spam though. It's just information overload, plain and simple. I want to read Medium's suggested posts, and Twitter's relevant tweets. I'm really interested in the new feature your startup just rolled out, and I want to get your event updates, because you have some really cool speakers. But I just. Can't. Keep. Up. So you'll forgive me when I don't subscribe. It's not because I think your emails are spam. It's just because I need a diet.
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Why Innovation In Payments Is So Rare
I think a lot about payments, even though I haven't worked in the sector for over five years. I just think it's mind-blowingly cool that this abstract concept we call money manages to work, everywhere around the world, in mutually recognizable forms, not with perfect interoperability but damn near close to it on a local level, with universal understanding that it is simultaneously a medium to measure value (a price); a medium to transact (making a purchase); and at a minimally higher level of financial literacy, a value store (an account).
Yet as cool as a concept as money is, retail payments in the US haven't changed all that much since the advent of credit cards. Your options are basically check, card, or cash. I was reading an interview this morning that StrictlyVC did with Todd Chaffee of Institutional Venture Partners, that goes a long way towards explaining why.
Yet as cool as a concept as money is, retail payments in the US haven't changed all that much since the advent of credit cards. Your options are basically check, card, or cash. I was reading an interview this morning that StrictlyVC did with Todd Chaffee of Institutional Venture Partners, that goes a long way towards explaining why.
Labels:
banking,
finance,
financial system,
government,
money,
Payments,
Startups,
trust
Monday, December 22, 2014
Lyft vs Uber in a Broader Cultural Context
About a week ago I wrote about how the United States was reindustrializing, and how a personal connection to the production of goods, or a personality in the case of services, was a key component of the new offerings. Today Mashable wrote an article called "Why Lyft is trimming its pink mustache" that speaks to this topic in the context of the Lyft vs Uber, David vs Goliath battle.
Thursday, December 18, 2014
I Read the NY Times Offline. It Sucked. Here Are Eight Reasons Why
A while ago, a migraine forced me to read the NY Times in its print edition, something I haven't done in years. It was such an awful user experience. Here are the reasons why:
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Not to Defend the North Koreans, But ...
Did it occur to anyone that making a movie about assassinating the leader of another country, in peacetime no less, might be in really bad taste? Not even a historical leader, like Hitler, but an actual, living, sitting leader.
I don't find it offensive; I wouldn't advocate for Sony to be censored; nor do I condone cyberattacks on Sony or making terrorist threats on movie theaters. It's just that the premise of the movie is in bad taste.
I don't find it offensive; I wouldn't advocate for Sony to be censored; nor do I condone cyberattacks on Sony or making terrorist threats on movie theaters. It's just that the premise of the movie is in bad taste.
Labels:
#TheInterview,
Iran,
movies,
news,
North Korea,
Sony,
US
Saturday, December 13, 2014
The Reindustrialization of America
Society is undergoing a process of reindustrialization. Unlike the
previous century of industrialization, which produced most of the basic tools
and features of our daily lives, the current reindustrialization is less about
inventing new categories and more about rethinking how things are done from a new perspective. [1]
Labels:
craft,
industrialization,
Maslow,
reindustrialization
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Web 3.0 Is Already Here
I had this realization as I was reading my friend Matt Turck's TechCrunch post, The Internet of Things Is Reaching Escape Velocity. Matt referred to the Web 1.0 giants as being Google and Amazon, and Web 2.0 being Facebook and Twitter. The speculation then, is will there be a similar pair of giants to come out of Web 3.0?
Friday, September 19, 2014
Let the Russians Have PBR
There's been a lot of activity on the Twittersphere today about the purchase of 170 year-old Pabst Brewing Company by six year-old Oasis Beverages of Russia. Yes, that's right folks, the Russians now own such iconic American brands as PBR, Colt 45, Schlitz, Ballantine, and National Bohemian ("Natty Bo"). Some see this as something to mourn for. I say, thank you Russia for the $700M in cash.
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Reid Hoffman and Carl Icahn Are Both Right
Reid is right that commerce and payments are a powerful combination, not disparate platforms, but Icahn is right that eBay is covering up PayPal's value.
Labels:
Carl Icahn,
eBay,
John Donohoe,
M&A,
PayPal,
Reid Hoffman,
VC,
Venture Capital,
Visa,
Wall Street
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Google's Sneaky New Map Trick
Google maps stopped showing you addresses. Huh?
Labels:
addresses,
Asimov,
data,
geolocation,
Google,
maps,
Three Laws of Robotics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

